<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which Tiny House Plans Should I Draw Next?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tinyhousedesign.com/2009/04/08/which-tiny-house-plans-should-i-draw-next/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tinyhousedesign.com/2009/04/08/which-tiny-house-plans-should-i-draw-next/</link>
	<description>more attainable &#38; sustainable</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:19:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.tinyhousedesign.com/2009/04/08/which-tiny-house-plans-should-i-draw-next/comment-page-1/#comment-14846</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 02:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinyhousedesign.com/?p=1501#comment-14846</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still waiting for the &quot;Cabin with Porch&quot; drawing. I like it the best of all. I would put a screen porch on the front.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still waiting for the &#8220;Cabin with Porch&#8221; drawing. I like it the best of all. I would put a screen porch on the front.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kieran</title>
		<link>http://www.tinyhousedesign.com/2009/04/08/which-tiny-house-plans-should-i-draw-next/comment-page-1/#comment-1499</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 02:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinyhousedesign.com/?p=1501#comment-1499</guid>
		<description>I like that better than the other design! I also like that the overhanging end isn&#039;t very tall. Do you think something like that is plausible for a tiny house on wheels?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like that better than the other design! I also like that the overhanging end isn&#8217;t very tall. Do you think something like that is plausible for a tiny house on wheels?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Janzen</title>
		<link>http://www.tinyhousedesign.com/2009/04/08/which-tiny-house-plans-should-i-draw-next/comment-page-1/#comment-1498</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Janzen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 00:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinyhousedesign.com/?p=1501#comment-1498</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a cool, albeit big, butterfly roof where the rain catchment isn&#039;t over the living area. Now this is starting to make sense to me. http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/04/09/the-solar-powered-wombat-towers-house/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a cool, albeit big, butterfly roof where the rain catchment isn&#8217;t over the living area. Now this is starting to make sense to me. <a href="http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/04/09/the-solar-powered-wombat-towers-house/" rel="nofollow">http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/04/09/the-solar-powered-wombat-towers-house/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kieran</title>
		<link>http://www.tinyhousedesign.com/2009/04/08/which-tiny-house-plans-should-i-draw-next/comment-page-1/#comment-1497</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinyhousedesign.com/?p=1501#comment-1497</guid>
		<description>I was skeptical about that, too, actually; I suppose wishful thinking is always nice, haha.

I&#039;m a little more anxious to see how your design for this turns out, as no matter which you choose to create, it will allow slightly more room for some of the conveniences you had to &quot;squeeze&quot; into your last interior design.

Your book sounds fascinating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was skeptical about that, too, actually; I suppose wishful thinking is always nice, haha.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a little more anxious to see how your design for this turns out, as no matter which you choose to create, it will allow slightly more room for some of the conveniences you had to &#8220;squeeze&#8221; into your last interior design.</p>
<p>Your book sounds fascinating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveR</title>
		<link>http://www.tinyhousedesign.com/2009/04/08/which-tiny-house-plans-should-i-draw-next/comment-page-1/#comment-1492</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 09:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinyhousedesign.com/?p=1501#comment-1492</guid>
		<description>Michael,

Sounds like it will be a very interesting book! but of course I wouldn&#039;t want you to reveal your book via the online blog as I assume it is meant to assist with your financial independence.

On the other hand, I know several people now who have formulated books based on the input of the online community, with the blog leading the direction of the discussions. So, maybe a suggestion is to direct the blog to the tiny house design topics to be covered by your book. Throw out a teaser idea, solicit feedback and ideas. We all learn together. Your book is the refinement and weaving of those ideas into a contextual whole. 

That way your &#039;other stuff&#039; and the writing of the book are happening at the same time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>Sounds like it will be a very interesting book! but of course I wouldn&#8217;t want you to reveal your book via the online blog as I assume it is meant to assist with your financial independence.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I know several people now who have formulated books based on the input of the online community, with the blog leading the direction of the discussions. So, maybe a suggestion is to direct the blog to the tiny house design topics to be covered by your book. Throw out a teaser idea, solicit feedback and ideas. We all learn together. Your book is the refinement and weaving of those ideas into a contextual whole. </p>
<p>That way your &#8216;other stuff&#8217; and the writing of the book are happening at the same time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Janzen</title>
		<link>http://www.tinyhousedesign.com/2009/04/08/which-tiny-house-plans-should-i-draw-next/comment-page-1/#comment-1489</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Janzen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 05:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinyhousedesign.com/?p=1501#comment-1489</guid>
		<description>You just described the book I&#039;ve been trying to write... The Tiny Simple House... while doing all this other stuff too :-)

I think to do it justice I&#039;d need to write the book around the actual construction too. The photos and actual work to make all the systems work on a mobile platform would really require a working model.

But I do have plans to tidy up the 3 existing plans to a level where someone would have enough information for the basic structure. But eventually I agree with you 100%... I&#039;d love to take it all the way so there would be a single resource to empower someone to build a tiny mobile affordable green house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You just described the book I&#8217;ve been trying to write&#8230; The Tiny Simple House&#8230; while doing all this other stuff too <img src='http://www.tinyhousedesign.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I think to do it justice I&#8217;d need to write the book around the actual construction too. The photos and actual work to make all the systems work on a mobile platform would really require a working model.</p>
<p>But I do have plans to tidy up the 3 existing plans to a level where someone would have enough information for the basic structure. But eventually I agree with you 100%&#8230; I&#8217;d love to take it all the way so there would be a single resource to empower someone to build a tiny mobile affordable green house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveR</title>
		<link>http://www.tinyhousedesign.com/2009/04/08/which-tiny-house-plans-should-i-draw-next/comment-page-1/#comment-1488</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 04:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinyhousedesign.com/?p=1501#comment-1488</guid>
		<description>I think it might be instructive to take one of the existing plans to the point where someone could actually build them.

The challenge in a tiny house that is also mobile, is to design the systems of a house in a way in which it is flexible, lightweight, least cost and fully integrated. What do I mean by that?

It&#039;s one thing to design how it will look like on the outside so that it&#039;s attractive and weathertight, quite another to make the inside floorplan livable and efficient and quite another to have the plumbing, wiring, utilities fit into it with efficiency and greatest utility. And yet, I think in any tiny or small house, the secret is to make all these things work together and essentially to design them together. 

Large houses, to me, look like all these aspects were designed by different people so you end up with some ridiculous things ( oops, part of the window has to end up in the shower space so that the front of the house is symmetrical). 

You know, architects pleasing themselves but not designing for humans.

I think if some time was spent thinking how to integrate everything, then some ideas would come out which can be reused in any design. 

Seems a lot of what I find on the net are people&#039;s showing off their finished product - but being curious me - and hoping to be able to reproduce the best ideas, I want to know the nuts and bolts. How did they do it? How did you handle hot water for the shower, where does the gray water go? How do you collect water from the roof? How do the walls go together? Did you nail that sill plate to the frame or bolt it? Where do you run the wiring? How is it weathertight to road spray? and so on..

Might even be fun to start designing from inside out. What do you want in a tiny house? What&#039;s the best way to do that? Permaculture has this idea of zones that radiate outwards. The closest zones are for things you use every day, the farthest zones are for things rarely used or visited but necessary. A house designed this way may end up looking entirely different than any of the &#039;traditional&#039; house looks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it might be instructive to take one of the existing plans to the point where someone could actually build them.</p>
<p>The challenge in a tiny house that is also mobile, is to design the systems of a house in a way in which it is flexible, lightweight, least cost and fully integrated. What do I mean by that?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s one thing to design how it will look like on the outside so that it&#8217;s attractive and weathertight, quite another to make the inside floorplan livable and efficient and quite another to have the plumbing, wiring, utilities fit into it with efficiency and greatest utility. And yet, I think in any tiny or small house, the secret is to make all these things work together and essentially to design them together. </p>
<p>Large houses, to me, look like all these aspects were designed by different people so you end up with some ridiculous things ( oops, part of the window has to end up in the shower space so that the front of the house is symmetrical). </p>
<p>You know, architects pleasing themselves but not designing for humans.</p>
<p>I think if some time was spent thinking how to integrate everything, then some ideas would come out which can be reused in any design. </p>
<p>Seems a lot of what I find on the net are people&#8217;s showing off their finished product &#8211; but being curious me &#8211; and hoping to be able to reproduce the best ideas, I want to know the nuts and bolts. How did they do it? How did you handle hot water for the shower, where does the gray water go? How do you collect water from the roof? How do the walls go together? Did you nail that sill plate to the frame or bolt it? Where do you run the wiring? How is it weathertight to road spray? and so on..</p>
<p>Might even be fun to start designing from inside out. What do you want in a tiny house? What&#8217;s the best way to do that? Permaculture has this idea of zones that radiate outwards. The closest zones are for things you use every day, the farthest zones are for things rarely used or visited but necessary. A house designed this way may end up looking entirely different than any of the &#8216;traditional&#8217; house looks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Janzen</title>
		<link>http://www.tinyhousedesign.com/2009/04/08/which-tiny-house-plans-should-i-draw-next/comment-page-1/#comment-1487</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Janzen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 04:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinyhousedesign.com/?p=1501#comment-1487</guid>
		<description>Kieran,

You know those butterfly roofs are really cool but they seem like they ask to leak. I realize it would need some kind of metal flashing is all but it would eventually be a weak spot for leaking. But I agree it would make rain water collection super easy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kieran,</p>
<p>You know those butterfly roofs are really cool but they seem like they ask to leak. I realize it would need some kind of metal flashing is all but it would eventually be a weak spot for leaking. But I agree it would make rain water collection super easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.tinyhousedesign.com/2009/04/08/which-tiny-house-plans-should-i-draw-next/comment-page-1/#comment-1485</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 03:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinyhousedesign.com/?p=1501#comment-1485</guid>
		<description>I think the designs look great!  The problem I see with all of them is the loft area.  With such small houses, having a loft area above the bath/kitchen is imperative.  The roof angles here all seem to work against lofts.  

I&#039;d vote for the pitched roof with the gables over the rest, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the designs look great!  The problem I see with all of them is the loft area.  With such small houses, having a loft area above the bath/kitchen is imperative.  The roof angles here all seem to work against lofts.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;d vote for the pitched roof with the gables over the rest, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kieran</title>
		<link>http://www.tinyhousedesign.com/2009/04/08/which-tiny-house-plans-should-i-draw-next/comment-page-1/#comment-1484</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 02:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinyhousedesign.com/?p=1501#comment-1484</guid>
		<description>You certainly are a tenacious man, Michael! But if it&#039;s your passion, then kudos. Sincerely, I believe I like all four, especially the first three; however, I kept with tradition and voted on the solar with gables. It seems to solve the problem of not knowing where/how to place a possible PV, no? haha.

If you don&#039;t mind my making a suggestion for a future possible design, I really like this design that I saw for the idea of self-sufficient/self-contained usage:

http://www.powerhouse-enterprises.com/ph_powerpods.html

A trailer-based home, as usual, but with that &quot;butterfly&quot; roof for water collection and solar positioning would be interesting.

What sayeth ye?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You certainly are a tenacious man, Michael! But if it&#8217;s your passion, then kudos. Sincerely, I believe I like all four, especially the first three; however, I kept with tradition and voted on the solar with gables. It seems to solve the problem of not knowing where/how to place a possible PV, no? haha.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t mind my making a suggestion for a future possible design, I really like this design that I saw for the idea of self-sufficient/self-contained usage:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.powerhouse-enterprises.com/ph_powerpods.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.powerhouse-enterprises.com/ph_powerpods.html</a></p>
<p>A trailer-based home, as usual, but with that &#8220;butterfly&#8221; roof for water collection and solar positioning would be interesting.</p>
<p>What sayeth ye?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

