<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Home Office Cube in Chile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tinyhousedesign.com/2009/08/25/home-office-cube-in-chile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tinyhousedesign.com/2009/08/25/home-office-cube-in-chile/</link>
	<description>more attainable &#38; sustainable</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:19:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrey</title>
		<link>http://www.tinyhousedesign.com/2009/08/25/home-office-cube-in-chile/comment-page-1/#comment-6632</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinyhousedesign.com/?p=2638#comment-6632</guid>
		<description>Красивый дом.
Домик очень понравился.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Красивый дом.<br />
Домик очень понравился.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oficina Cubo en el JARDÍN de hormigón visto y celosías de madera</title>
		<link>http://www.tinyhousedesign.com/2009/08/25/home-office-cube-in-chile/comment-page-1/#comment-2630</link>
		<dc:creator>Oficina Cubo en el JARDÍN de hormigón visto y celosías de madera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 06:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinyhousedesign.com/?p=2638#comment-2630</guid>
		<description>[...] La Oficina Cubo es un proyecto de Claudio Labarca y Juan Ignacio López. Fotos de Giuseppe Bruculleri, María Paz Lobos recogidas de Plataforma Arquitectura. Visto en Tiny House Design. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] La Oficina Cubo es un proyecto de Claudio Labarca y Juan Ignacio López. Fotos de Giuseppe Bruculleri, María Paz Lobos recogidas de Plataforma Arquitectura. Visto en Tiny House Design. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant Wagner</title>
		<link>http://www.tinyhousedesign.com/2009/08/25/home-office-cube-in-chile/comment-page-1/#comment-2623</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant Wagner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinyhousedesign.com/?p=2638#comment-2623</guid>
		<description>I saw a very similar idea at this year&#039;s Midwest Renewable Energy Fair. While it wasn&#039;t used for window coverings, the static walls of the structure were first covered in a black plastic, and then covered with what looked like 1&quot;x2&quot; horizontal slats. There was about an inch air gap behind them to the structure itself, and an inch space between the slats. It gave a very impressive appearance.

The other thing I really liked about it was that it seemed like a very efficient use of material. There is only about a 66% surface covering, but the underlaying surface is protected from most of the elements, allowing for a much more flimsy  external wall covering. All the material you are using are from a much less expensive 1&quot;x2&quot; material, which is much more readily available that the larger solid shakes most of us would like.

It&#039;s definitely something I&#039;ll be looking to do with my tiny home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw a very similar idea at this year&#8217;s Midwest Renewable Energy Fair. While it wasn&#8217;t used for window coverings, the static walls of the structure were first covered in a black plastic, and then covered with what looked like 1&#8243;x2&#8243; horizontal slats. There was about an inch air gap behind them to the structure itself, and an inch space between the slats. It gave a very impressive appearance.</p>
<p>The other thing I really liked about it was that it seemed like a very efficient use of material. There is only about a 66% surface covering, but the underlaying surface is protected from most of the elements, allowing for a much more flimsy  external wall covering. All the material you are using are from a much less expensive 1&#8243;x2&#8243; material, which is much more readily available that the larger solid shakes most of us would like.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s definitely something I&#8217;ll be looking to do with my tiny home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

